The McCain/Palin campaign has again revised its description of Sarah Palin’s only trip outside of North America. This time, more importantly than the last clarification, it turns out that she HASN’T been to Iraq after all.
Look, I don’t care about the first one — whether she spent an hour or a week in Ireland makes no difference to me as it pertains to her foreign policy experience. And honestly, whether she spent time on this side of the Iraq border or that side doesn’t particularly bother me either, given the breadth and depth of how deeply unqualified to take over the presidency she seems to be. We’re talking about very small distinctions. What bothers me is the lying and its underlying message that they need to fabricate a global view for this woman out of one-hour layovers in Ireland. Not simply because the lying is bad, though it is. What irks me is that by doing all this lying and retracting (notice how they retract this on a Saturday during Hurricane Ike coverage), they are indicating that they think it’s bad news that Sarah Palin, for all intents and purposes, hasn’t been anywhere. If they think it’s important, why is she the VP candidate? And if they don’t, why aren’t they saying so?
I just wonder who turned them down. Given the layers and layers of nonsense that keeps coming out about Sarah Palin, she was either a) vetted by a team of nearsighted, crack-smoking lemurs (a great, heartwarming advancement in the uphill battle for the rights of chemically-dependent tail-swinging primates), or b) a late-in-the-count audible after a couple of other options dried up. Seriously, no one thing about Palin has been a slam dunk as far as I’m concerned. But friend, she’s a flippin’ ocean of highly questionable raindrops.
This was funny for a while, but it’s getting hard to watch. More to the point, it’s harder still to understand why ANYONE is on the fence about this race. This election is a choice between an ice cream cone and a sock in the nose. And I don’t mean to cast one candidate as ice cream, either (though I think we all know how I feel about it). All character assignments aside, these guys really are simply that different. How anyone, right or left, black or white, tall or short, or whatever else can look at the Obama/McCain choice and go, “jeez, I JUST don’t know … it’s SO hard to decide …” is baffling to me.
All I can figure is that people shut down in the face of details. Two guys, both senators, both wear suits, both have divisive running mates, both are visibly humanoid with two arms and two legs apiece … they clearly must be exactly the same. And now that we have the choice of making history with either a woman or a black man elected to high office, even the people who just like to make waves are stumped.
Sometimes I think there should be a simple test — maybe five basic civics questions — before you’re allowed to vote. I’ll even give you a 60% pass — get three out of five and you get to vote. Get fewer than three, you’re not informed enough to weigh in on MY life, rights, children, and so on. But man, if you want to see the disinterested come out in droves and vote like never before, all you have to do is try to take away their right to vote with a dart. You’ll see record turnout then. God Bless America.